@CNN FDA will evaluate Pfizer's request to allow Covid-19 vaccine for children ages 12-15 'as quickly as possible,' acting commissioner says
With main article and top criticizing and clarifying comments, links and images further down after the main article.
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/04/09/health/us-coronavirus-friday/index.html
https://www.facebook.com/cnn/posts/10161901918521509

Top Criticizing and Clarifying Comment Links

The very Dubious Worldwide Covid and Mass Vaccination Agenda
http://www.tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=The%20very%20Dubious%20Worldwide%20Covid%20and%20Vaccination%20Agenda&relationship=All &drsid=0&pisid=0&page=1
On facebook scroll down (or up) if needed to see the comment and potentially reply yourself:
https://www.facebook.com/cnn/posts/10161901918521509?comment_id=10161901932116509¬if_t=feedback_reaction_generic

Lets look at the complete covid vaccination damages picture by age category! Really, do the benefits of the covid viruslike damaging mRNA and DNA vaccines outweigh the risks for the young and all the middle aged?

Lets put the above little tested risks of mRNA and DNA vaccines in the context and perspective of healthy and young people. Because healthy people have a very low probability of dying from covid (see for example the table below with covid death probabilities for Belgium after about one year of covid per age category – an important proportion of the few deaths in this table probably go along with pre-existing disease), the general advice, coercion or luring to vaccinate those healthy people with these kind of vaccines, that invade and genetically manipulate our body cells into producing potentially volatile concentrations of covid spike protein and that have only been tested in the short term, are on the verge of the criminal for so many reasons one being people also die after covid vaccination.

Breaking! Analysing the figures of EudraVigilance, the European database of vaccination damages, the above covid vaccination damages situation appears to be disastrously worse for young and healthy people. I managed to estimate probabilities for reported adverse effects and death after vaccination by age category by combining the figures from EudraVigilance by age category, Belgian vaccinated people by age category and the total vaccinated EEA (European Economic Area) people. See the table below. Under the latter table I copied the above table of death probabilities after about one year of covid for comparison purpose.

Estimated Probabilities After Covid Vaccination
Age...........Rep. Adv. Eff. Estimated Prob....Death after Vacc. Est. Prob.
0-17..........0,0046744..........................................0,0000534
18-64........0,0037028..........................................0,0000423
65-85........0,0008883..........................................0,0000101
85+...........0,0005378..........................................0,0000061
All Ages...0,0023391..........................................0,0000267

Belgian Death Probabilities after about one year of Covid
Age...........Man................Woman
0-24..........0,0000000.....0,0000025
25-44........0,0000161.....0,0000128
45-64........0,0002212.....0,0001146

Whereas death probabilities after about one year of covid decrease with younger age to almost zero for young people, covid vaccination clearly shows the opposite trend with reported adverse effect probabilities and death probabilities increasing with younger age. The latter increase results in high reported adverse effect probabilities and death probabilities after covid vaccination that are:
– for the young extremely higher than the death probability after about one year of covid.
– for a lower age range of the middle aged substantially higher than the death probability after about one year of covid.

Because of disfunctional availability of the needed data to calculate the estimated probabilities I had to apply several shortcuts in the calculation which introduce certain assumptions about the domain. For example the Belgian vaccinated people distribution by age category was applied on the EEA as a whole. I'm confident that all of those assumptions are very plausible. Still if one or some of those assumptions would be far off target the estimated probabilities and trends could be seriously unvalidated. Therefore the estimates and trends are with reservation of the latter and of potential errors in the data used. This being said I want to point out that the trend of increasing vaccination damage probabilities with younger age can also easily be understood from the underlying data. See the screenshots (push ctrl+ to enlarge) of EudraVigilance in appendix A and the general knowledge that almost everywhere, as in Belgium, the elderly and vulnerable have priority for vaccination. Furthermore I find it uncomprehensible that the Ema, supposed to protect the health of all the people of all ages, did not publish up to now those vaccination damage probabilities by age category. Therefore I challenge the Ema to do so without applying the shortcuts I had to apply. And then we could peer review eachother.

Why mass vaccinaton amidst a pandemic creates an irrepressible monster
https://mcusercontent.com/92561d6dedb66a43fe9a6548f/files/bead7203-0798-4ac8-abe2-076208015556/Public_health_emergency_of_international_concert_Geert_Vanden_Bossche.01.pdf
On facebook scroll down (or up) if needed to see the comment and potentially reply yourself:
https://www.facebook.com/cnn/posts/10161901918521509?comment_id=1212891719150199¬if_t=feedback_reaction_generic

Main Article and Top Criticizing and Clarifying Comment Images (press ctrl+ for more image detail)